Effectiveness Of Restorative Justice In Traffic Accident Case Settlement And Its Implications For The Parties Involved

Research Study At Bintan Police Station

Authors

  • Jul Ilham University of Batam, Batam City
  • Erniyanti Erniyanti University of Batam, Batam City
  • M. Soerya Respationo University of Batam, Batam City
  • Ramlan Ramlan University of Batam, Batam City

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v2i3.936

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Restorative Justice, Traffic Accidents

Abstract

Traffic accidents are a severe problem that significantly impacts people's safety and well-being. In Indonesia, the restorative justice approach has been adopted as an alternative to resolving traffic accident cases, which aims to restore the relationship between the perpetrator and the victim and reduce the burden on the criminal justice system. This study focuses on the effectiveness of the implementation of restorative justice by the Bintan Subregional Police in resolving traffic accident cases in Batam City, as well as its implications for the parties involved. This study aims to analyze how the application of restorative justice can affect the settlement of traffic accident cases, assess the effectiveness of this approach, and identify relevant obstacles and solutions to optimize its implementation. The research method used is qualitative, collecting data through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis. The research respondents comprised police officers, victims, perpetrators, and community leaders involved in the mediation process. The study results show that implementing restorative justice by the Bintan Subregional Police has excellent potential to create a fairer and more satisfactory settlement for all parties involved. However, its effectiveness is still hampered by limited resources and training for the police, lack of public understanding, and suboptimal coordination between institutions. The proposed solutions include increasing training programs for police officers, drafting more detailed regulations, and intensifying socialization to the public about the benefits and processes of restorative justice. The study suggests that police forces increase training and resources, communities are more active in supporting this approach, and governments develop regulations that support and improve coordination between agencies. By overcoming these obstacles, the application of restorative justice in resolving traffic accident cases can be more effective and provide more significant benefits to the community, as well as increase trust in the criminal justice system in Indonesia.

References

Ali, A. (2019). Menguak teori hukum (legal theory) dan teori peradilan (judicialprudence). Kencana Prenada Group.

Ambarriani, A. S. (2011). Manajemen biaya dengan tekanan stratejik. Salemba Empat.

Anonymous. (2014). Buku pedoman penyusunan proposal dan tesis program magister ilmu hukum pascasarjana (S2). Universitas Batam.

Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Penerapan prinsip restorative justice dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Al’Adl, 10(2).

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Hukum progresif: Suatu pembaharuan dan pendekatan baru dalam memahami hukum. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Dimyati, K. (2015). Teorisasi hukum: Studi tentang perkembangan pemikiran hukum di Indonesia 1945-1990. Muhamadiyah University Press.

Echols, J. M., & Shadily, H. (2013). Kamus Inggris Indonesia. PT. Gramedia.

Erniyanti, & Purba, D. F. (2024). Penataan penegakan hukum maritim menuju Indonesia maju. Gita Lentera.

Friedman, L. M. (2009). Sistem hukum dalam perspektif ilmu sosial: The legal system: A social science perspective. Nusa Media.

Friedman, W. (2010). Teori dan filsafat hukum: Telaah kritis atas teori-teori hukum (Susunan I). Rajawali.

Fuady, M. (2013). Teori-teori besar (grand theory) dalam hukum. Kencana.

Guntari, T, Upaya Penal dan Non Penal dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup, Jurnal Advokatura, Volume 1 Nomor 1, 2022.

Guntari, T. (2022). Upaya penal dan non-penal dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana lingkungan hidup. Jurnal Advokatura, 1(1).

Hanafi Arief, Ningrum Ambarsari. “Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia”. Dalam jurnal Al’Adl, Volume X Nomor 2, Juli 2018.

Handoko, T. H. (2010). Organisasi perusahaan: Teori, struktur dan perilaku. Yogyakarta.

Huijbers, T. (2011). Filsafat hukum. Kanisius.

Hutauruk, R. H. (2013). Penanggulangan kejahatan korporasi melalui pendekatan restoratif: Suatu terobosan hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Irani, A. W., Susanto, M. H., & Pangaribuan, P. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban hukum terhadap korban kecelakaan lalu lintas akibat kelalaian pengemudi. Jurnal Krtha Bhayangkara, 4(2).

Irani, A. W., Susanto, M. H., & Pangaribuan, P. Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Terhadap Korban Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Akibat Kelalaian Pengemudi. Jurnal Krtha Bhayangkara, Volume 4 Nomor 2, 2022.

Kojongian, D. (2015). Tindakan diskresi polisi dalam pelaksanaan tugas penyidikan. Jurnal Lex Crime, 4(4).

Kojongian, D. Tindakan Diskresi Polisi Dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Penyidikan. Jurnal Lex Crime, Volume 4 Nomor 4, 2015.

Komaruddin. (2014). Ensiklopedia manajemen. Bina Aksara.

Kusumaatmadja, M. (2012). Konsep-konsep hukum dalam pembangunan. Alumni.

Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Marder, I. D, Mapping Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices in Criminal Justice in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 2022.

Marder, I. D. (2022). Mapping restorative justice and restorative practices in criminal justice in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice.

Muhajir, N. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Roke Sarasin.

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.

Prakorso, A. (2013). Kriminologi dan hukum pidana. Laksbang Grafika.

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Hukum progresif: Sebuah sintesa hukum Indonesia. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Rahardjo, S. (2016). Hukum progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Rahardjo, S. (2016). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rasyidi, L. (2006). Dasar-dasar filsafat hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Respationo, S. (2010). Etika politik dalam suatu negara demokrasi. Perdana Publishing.

Respationo, S. (2012). Pembagian urusan pemerintah dan pemerintah daerah. Perdana Publishing.

Siagian, S. P. (2015). Fungsi-fungsi manajemen. Bumi Aksara.

Sidharta, A. (2016). Meuwissen tentang pengembangan hukum, ilmu hukum, teori hukum dan filsafat hukum. Refika Aditama.

Sidharta, A. (2018). Transformasi hukum dan hukum progresif. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sidharta, M. A. (2018). Transformasi hukum dan hukum progresif. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (2009). Metode penelitian survei. LP3ES.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2013). Penelitian hukum normatif suatu tinjauan singkat (Cetakan ketujuh). Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soemitro, R. H. (2015). Metodologi penelitian hukum (Cetakan kedua). Ghalia Indonesia.

Soeryasumantri, J. S. (2008). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Sinar Harapan.

Steers, M. R. (2019). Efektifitas organisasi. Air Langga.

Sugono, B. (2011). Metoda penelitian hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.

Suhartono, I. (2009). Metode penelitian sosial: Suatu teknik penelitian bidang kesejahteraan sosial lainnya. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Supeno, H. (2016). Peradilan restoratif: Model peradilan anak Indonesia masa datang. Universitas Diponegoro.

Sya'ban, K. (2020). Kamus lengkap hukum. Media Pressindo.

Syamsudin, Budaya Hukum Hakim Berbasis Hukum Progresif, UII Pers, Yogyakarta, 2014.

Syamsudin. (2014). Budaya hukum hakim berbasis hukum progresif. UII Pers.

T. Hani Handoko, Organisasi Perusahaan, Teori, Struktur dan Prilaku, Yogyakarta, Jakarta, 2010.

Theo Huijbers, Filsafat Hukum, Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 2011.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia;

Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 22 tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan;

W. Friedman, Teori dan Filsafat Hukum, Telaah Kritis atasTeori-teori Hukum (susunan I), diterjemahkan dari buku aslinya “Legal Theory” oleh Mohamad Arifin, Rajawali, Jakarta, 2010.

Published

2024-08-03

How to Cite

Jul Ilham, Erniyanti Erniyanti, M. Soerya Respationo, & Ramlan Ramlan. (2024). Effectiveness Of Restorative Justice In Traffic Accident Case Settlement And Its Implications For The Parties Involved: Research Study At Bintan Police Station. International Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts, Culture, and Social Humanities, 2(3), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v2i3.936

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.