Informal Language and Sentiment Analysis in Brooklyn Rap Style

A Study of Ageng Carlitos' Instagram Videos

Authors

  • Meghna Nayda Salsabila Universitas Pekalongan
  • Dwi Ario Fajar Universitas Pekalongan
  • Sattra Sahatsathatsana Kalasin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v4i3.1914

Keywords:

English Learning, Informal Language, Instagram, Brooklyn Rap Style, Sentiment Analysis

Abstract

The use of informal language has become increasingly common in social media communication, especially among content creators who aim to make their content more engaging and relatable. This study aims to analyze the types and functions of informal language used in Ageng Carlitos’ Instagram videos and to examine viewers’ responses through sentiment analysis. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method. The data were collected from two Instagram videos, “Warung Es Cekek Asli Brooklyn” and “Stereotype”, along with viewers’ comments. The findings revealed five types of informal language: slang, contractions, abbreviations, colloquial expressions, and simplified grammatical structures. Slang was identified as the most frequently used type and reflected the characteristics of the Brooklyn rap style. The analysis also showed that informal language served several communicative functions, such as creating a friendly atmosphere, simplifying communication, and attracting viewers’ attention. In addition, the sentiment analysis indicated that positive comments dominated viewers’ responses, suggesting that Ageng Carlitos’ conversational style successfully increased viewers' interest and helped them understand the intended messages. Therefore, informal language can be considered an effective strategy for delivering English-learning content through social media.

References

Aadil, G. G., and D. Samad. 2023. “Exploring the Impact of Informal Language on Sentiment Analysis Models for Social Media Text Using Convolutional Neural Networks.” Multidiszciplináris Tudományok 13(1):244–54.

Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gumanay, J. A. 2026. “Code-Switching Practices of YouTube Educational Content Creators Using Ceblish.” Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 8(2):1–19.

Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent. In D. Tannen & A. M. Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media (pp. 1–25). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Kapoor, K. K., K. Tamilmani, N. P. Rana, P. Patil, Y. K. Dwivedi, and S. Nerur. 2018. “Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future.” Information Systems Frontiers 20(3):531–58.

Lotherington, H., and N. Bradley. 2024. “Hey Siri: Should Language, Emoji, and Follow Me Be Taught? A Historical Review of Evolving Communication Conventions Across Digital Media Environments and Uncomfortable Questions for Language Teachers.”

Mulaudzi, I., R. Makhwathana, and N. Nndwamato. 2026. “Unlocking Language Potential: How Mother Tongue Shapes English Acquisition in Rural Grade 1 Classrooms of South Africa.” Forum for Linguistic Studies. doi:10.30564/fls.v8i1.12390.

Ngaji, F. M., S. I. Prasetyo, V. D. Alexandra, R. D. San, and Y. Nata. 2025. “Digital Discourse, Public Sentiment, and Ideology: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Social Media Networks on Demonstrations in Yogyakarta.” Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change 1885–96.

Pujiati, T., R. S. Anjani, D. R. ZA, and B. Kurniawan. 2025. “The Use of Slang Language as Strategy of Communication in Alasrajah Village: A Sociolinguistic Study.” IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature 13(2):6168–78.

Rahma, N., and M. Moetia. 2024. “An Analysis of Using Slang Word in Social Media X.” Syntax Idea 6(8):3562–70.

Selfa-Sastre, M., M. Pifarré, A. Cujba, L. Cutillas, and E. Falguera. 2022. “The Role of Digital Technologies to Promote Collaborative Creativity in Language Education.” Frontiers in Psychology 13:828981.

Sharipova, M. 2025. “Impact of Digital Technologies on Speech Communication.” E-Learning and Digital Media 20427530251379080.

Singhi, E. K., S. Fortich, V. Yin, and M. B. Antonoff. 2026. “Lung Cancer Education on Social Media: Use Patterns and Content Preferences from a Cross-Sectional Study.” Journal of Thoracic Disease 18(5):493.

Wakhyuningtyas, H., and L. Rahmadiva. 2025. “Digital Communication Campaign on Instagram @Gigigo.Id: Oral Health Education.” Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities 8:3298–3309. doi:10.24815/jr.v8i3.47803.

Zhang, M. 2026. “Research on the Communication Narrative Strategies and Effect Improvement of Educational Content on Short Video Platforms.” Journal of Education and Educational Research 17:11–14. doi:10.54097/r7drp541.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06

How to Cite

Meghna Nayda Salsabila, Dwi Ario Fajar, & Sattra Sahatsathatsana. (2026). Informal Language and Sentiment Analysis in Brooklyn Rap Style: A Study of Ageng Carlitos’ Instagram Videos. International Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts, Culture, and Social Humanities, 4(3), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v4i3.1914

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.