The Influence of Organizational Culture, Problem-Solving Ability, and Work Motivation on Labor Performance at Jambi University

Devie Novallyan; Martinis Yamin; Risnita Risnita

doi:10.59024/ijellacush.v3i2.1312

Authors

Devie Novallyan UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Martinis Yamin UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
Risnita Risnita UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v3i2.1312

Keywords:

Organizational Culture, Problem Solving Ability, Motivation, Performance, Laboratory Assistant

Abstract

This study aims to describe and analyze the magnitude of the direct and indirect influence of the effectiveness of organizational culture, laboratory assistant problem-solving ability, and Motivation on laboratory assistant performance. The study used a quantitative approach with a survey design. The population of lecturers was 608 and laboratory assistants 15, while the sample of lecturers 132 and laboratory assistants 15 were taken by purposive sampling. Data was collected through a Likert scale questionnaire, which was then analyzed using path analysis. The study's results showed that: 1) organizational culture directly affects laboratory assistant performance. This can be seen from the significance value of 0.000 <0.05. In addition, the t_count value = 11.254 > t_table = 1.970; 2) laboratory assistant problem-solving ability directly affects laboratory assistant performance. This can be seen from the significance value of 0.045 <0.05. In addition, the t_count value = 2.224 > t_table = 1.970; 3) The laboratory assistant's Motivation directly affects the laboratory assistant's performance. This can be seen from the significance value of 0.034 <0.05. In addition, the t_count value = 2.366 > t_table = 1.970; 4) Organizational Culture and the laboratory assistant's problem-solving ability simultaneously affect the laboratory assistant's performance. This can be seen from the significance of 0.031 <0.05; 5) There is a simultaneous influence of Organizational Culture and Motivation on the performance of the laboratory assistant, this can be seen from the significance value of 0.023 <0.05; 6) There is no simultaneous influence of the problem-solving ability of the laboratory assistant and Motivation on the performance of the laboratory assistant, this can be seen from the significance value of 0.116 > 0.05; 7) the problem-solving ability of the laboratory assistant has a direct effect on the work motivation of the laboratory assistant, this can be seen from the significance value of 0.000 <0.05. In addition, the t_count value = 10.595 > t_table = 1.970; 8) Organizational Culture does not have a positive effect on Motivation. This can be seen from the significance value of 0.252 > 0.05. In addition, the t_count value = -1.199 < t_table = 1.970; 9) There is a simultaneous influence of Organizational Culture and the problem-solving ability of laboratory assistants on Motivation, this can be seen from the significance of 0.00 < 0.05; 10) There is a simultaneous influence of Organizational Culture, problem-solving ability of laboratory assistants and Motivation on Laboratory Assistant Performance. This can be seen from the significance of 0.050 = 0.05.These results provide the conclusion that organizational culture, laboratory assistant problem-solving ability and Motivation have a direct and simultaneous effect on laboratory assistant performance.

References

Achmad, G. N., & Fitriansyah, F. (2020). How compensation and motivation give impact to employee performance?. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 4(1).

Agung, D. I. B. M., & Jumaidi, N. (2023). The influence of various factors on employee performance. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 140(8), 69–77.

Ahmed, S., Shehata, M., & Hassanien, M. (2020). Emerging faculty needs for enhancing student engagement on a virtual platform. MedEd Publish, 1(5), 4. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000075.1

Aji, R. H. S. (2020). Dampak Covid-19 pada pendidikan di Indonesia: Sekolah, keterampilan, dan proses pembelajaran. Jurnal Sosial & Budaya Syar-I FSH UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 7(5), 3. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i5.15314

Al-Qathmi, A., & Zedan, H. (2021). The effect of incentive management system on turnover rate, job satisfaction, and motivation of medical laboratory technologists. Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology, 8, 2333392820988404.

Alqudsi-Ghabra, T., & Mansouri, H. H. (2010). Staff motivation at Kuwait University libraries. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 9(4), 355–363.

Bariyyah, K. (2021). Problem-solving skills: Essential skills challenges for 21st-century graduates. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(1), 71–80.

Benders, J., & van Veen, M. (2001). The effects of procedure knowledge and task structure on procedural error rates: An exploratory study. Cognition, Technology & Work, 3(3), 171–179.

Cahyaningrum, D. (2020). Program keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja di laboratorium pendidikan. Jurnal Pengelolaan Laboratorium Pendidikan, 2(1), 35–40.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. (2012). Designing and conducting mixed methods study. Sage Publications.

Darmawan. (2013). Pengaruh motivasi kerja dan kemampuan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 1(1), 5. http://administrasibisnis.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jab/article/view/28

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Deni Darmawan. (2004). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Duckworth, A. L., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 319–325.

Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087.

Ebrahim, M. A., Soliman, M. F., & Abdel-Aziz, M. H. (2020). Exploring the technical issues affecting engineering laboratories design in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.21275/SR20611124436

Elseria, E. (2016). Efektifitas pengelolaan laboratorium IPA. Jurnal Manajer Pendidikan, 10(1), 3. https://www.neliti.com/publications/270802

Emmanuel, I. O. (2017). Understanding organisational culture and organisational performance: Are they two sides of the same coin. Journal of Management Research, 1(9), 4. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.10261

Fatimah, R., & Firdaus, A. (2020). The influence of organizational culture, motivation, and competence on employee performance at XYZ. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(6), 4. http://ejournal.polbeng.ac.id/index.php/IBP/article/view/2810

Gilang, Arief, & Ambar. (2020). Pengaruh kemampuan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai dengan motivasi sebagai variabel mediasi di Kedai Kopi “Barista” di daerah Condong Catur, Yogyakarta. Entrepreneur: Jurnal Bisnis Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 3(1), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.31949/entrepreneur.v3i1.162

Gulo, W. (2002). Metodologi penelitian. Grasindo.

Gunawan, Suranti, N. M. Y., & Fathoroni. (2020). Variations of models and learning platforms for prospective teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education, 1(2), 5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350490268

Halim, A., & Hidayat, R. (2019). Manajemen laboratorium berbasis mutu. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.24235/jmpi.v7i2.2345

Handayani, T., & Wicaksono, A. (2021). The role of digital learning platforms in enhancing student engagement during the pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 24(2), 85–92.

Hapsari, N., & Pratama, I. (2020). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan terhadap motivasi kerja karyawan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8mz57

Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID-19 – School leadership in crisis?. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0041

Hasibuan, M. (2017). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bumi Aksara.

Hidayat, M., & Setiawan, T. (2020). Implementasi sistem K3 di laboratorium teknik elektro. Jurnal Teknik Elektro, 5(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/y7wqd

Indrawati, L., & Putra, G. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja karyawan: Kajian literatur. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 10(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/jx8z4

Irawan, D. (2021). Analisis penerapan SOP di laboratorium teknik industri. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 8(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.31512/jti.v8i1.234

Ismail, M., & Harun, R. (2019). Manajemen risiko di laboratorium pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 25(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v25i2.278

Jaya, M. R., & Purnomo, A. (2021). Pengaruh motivasi terhadap kinerja guru di masa pandemi. Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.21009/jp.v15i3.312

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.

Kadir, A., & Triwahyuni, E. (2020). Pengaruh pelatihan terhadap keterampilan kerja. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 9(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/b89xz

Kartika, S. (2020). Manajemen laboratorium sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/m7qd5

Laksana, B. P., & Rahmawati, N. (2021). Efektivitas pembelajaran daring pada masa pandemi. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v6i2.423

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Mangkunegara, A. A. P. (2015). Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa, E. (2018). Manajemen pendidikan karakter. Bumi Aksara.

Nurdin, S., & Hakim, R. (2020). Penerapan K3 di laboratorium farmasi. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 4(3), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.31512/jkm.v4i3.305

Puspitasari, R., & Arifin, Z. (2022). Faktor yang mempengaruhi motivasi kerja tenaga laboratorium. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 5(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/r7zq3

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sutrisno, E. (2016). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Kencana.

Wibowo, A. (2020). Manajemen laboratorium berbasis digital. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 3(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtik.v3i2.445

Wirawan, H. (2019). Evaluasi kinerja sumber daya manusia. Salemba Empat.

Yuliana, S., & Rahmat, F. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi loyalitas tenaga laboratorium. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, 10(3), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/v4g7h

Zainal, A., & Pratomo, D. (2021). Pengelolaan laboratorium berbasis teknologi 4.0. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtpi.v9i2.556

Zubaidah, S., & Haryono, T. (2020). Analisis penerapan protokol K3 di laboratorium pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 15(4), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v15i4.332