Discourse Analysis of Online News on The Pesut Samarinda Mountain: Teun A. Vand Dijk’s Model

Authors

  • Taqdiraa Taqdiraa Universitas Mulawarman
  • Yusak Hudiyono Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v3i2.1373

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Mahakam Pesut Monument, Online news, Public Opinion Teun A. van Dijk

Abstract

This study aims to analyze online news discourse surrounding the polemic of the construction of the Pesut Mahakam Monument in Samarinda City using Teun A. van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis model. This model consists of three main aspects: text structure (macrostructure, superstructure, and microstructure), social cognition (how news is constructed by the media), and social context (how social, political, and economic factors influence news discourse). The research data were obtained from five online media sources: suaralkaltim.id, kaltimpost.id, tribunjatim.com, kaltimfaktual.co, and kompas.com.The analysis reveals that the media discourse tends to construct a narrative of criticism toward the monument's design, which is considered unclear in representing the Pesut Mahakam figure. In addition, public attention is also focused on the transparency of the project’s budget, which amounts to IDR 1.1 billion. The majority of the public and art observers tend to support the criticisms of the project, while the government emphasizes aspects of urban revitalization and artistic value.Through this analytical approach, it is found that the use of language in online news plays a significant role in shaping public opinion regarding urban icon development projects. This study also highlights the importance of public participation and budget transparency in urban development initiatives to prevent prolonged polemics in the future. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the media's role in shaping public perception and the necessity of transparency and inclusive governance in regional development planning.

References

Alga. (2025, January 15). Telan biaya Rp 1 miliar, Tugu Pesut Samarinda bikin warga bingung. Desain dikritik: Mirip angka 0. Tribunjatim.com. https://jatim.tribunnews.com/2025/01/15/telan-biaya-rp1-miliar-tugu-pesut-samarinda-bikin-warga-bingung-desain-dikritik-mirip-angka-0

Amanda Fitriana, R., Gani, E., Ramadhan, S., & Kunci, K. (2019). Analisis wacana kritis berita online kasus penipuan travel umrah (Model Teun A. Van Dijk). BASINDO (Journal of Indonesian Language, Literature, and Learning Studies), 3(1). http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/basindo

Humaira, H. (2018). Analisis wacana kritis (AWK) model Teun A. Van Dijk pada pemberitaan surat kabar Republika. Literasi (Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature Research and Learning), 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/literasi.v2i1.951

Kharimah, N. (2025, January 30). Gaduh bentuk dan “nilai” Tugu Pesut Samarinda, transparansi ide tidak kalah pentingnya. Kaltimfaktual.co. https://kaltimfaktual.co/gaduh-bentuk-dan-nilai-tugu-pesut-samarinda-transparansi-ide-tidak-kalah-pentingnya/

Misnawati, M., Purwaka, A., Nurachmana, A., Cuesdeyeni, P., Christy, N. A., Ramadhan, I. Y., ... & Jumadi, J. (2024). Bahasa Indonesia untuk keperluan akademik era digital. Yayasan DPI.

Mudiawati, R. C., Hudiyono, Y., & Suhatmady, B. (2023). Analisis wacana kritis Norman Fairclough terhadap bahasa slogan aksi demonstrasi guru di Samarinda. Diglosia (Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya), 6(3), 739–762. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.694

Mukhlis, M., Al Masjid, A., Kusuma Widyanimgrum, H., & Komariah, K. (2020). Analisis wacana kritis model Teun A. Van Dijk pada surat kabar online dengan tajuk kilas balik pembelajaran jarak jauh akibat pandemi Covid-19. Geram: (Gerakan Anti Menulis), 8(2). https://doi.org/10.25299/geram.2020.vol8(2).5867

Putri, S. D. (2025, January 5). Tugu Pesut Rp 1,1 Miliar di Samarinda dinilai gagal wakili fauna khas Kaltim. Suarakaltim.id. https://kaltim.suara.com/read/2025/01/05/153000/tugu-pesut-rp-11-miliar-di-samarinda-dinilai-gagal-wakili-fauna-khas-kaltim

Samsuri, A., Mulawarman, W. G., & Hudiyono, Y. (2022). Ideologi penggunaan istilah-istilah Covid-19 di berita online: Analisis wacana kritis model Norman Fairclough. Diglosia (Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya), 5(3), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i3.442

Santoso, A. (n.d.). Studi wacana kritis, pengajaran bahasa Indonesia, dan perspektif emansipasi. Portal (Jurnal Elektronik). https://shorturl.at/AIkwz

Saputra, D. (2025, January 2). Banyak jadi omongan, Tugu Pesut di Simpang Mal Lembuswana anggaran miliaran. Kaltimpost.id. https://kaltimpost.jawapos.com/samarinda/2385482760/banyak-jadi-omongan-tugu-pesut-di-simpang-mal-lembuswana-habiskan-anggaran-miliaran#google_vignette

Setyaningrum, P. (2025, January 14). Tugu Pesut Samarinda, landmark baru Kota Tepian seharga Rp 1,1 miliar yang desainnya tuai kritik. Kompas.com. https://www.kompas.com/kalimantan-timur/read/2025/01/14/120343888/tugu-pesut-samarinda-landmark-baru-kota-tepian-seharga-rp-11?page=all

Downloads

Published

2025-04-17

How to Cite

Taqdiraa Taqdiraa, & Yusak Hudiyono. (2025). Discourse Analysis of Online News on The Pesut Samarinda Mountain: Teun A. Vand Dijk’s Model. International Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts, Culture, and Social Humanities, 3(2), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v3i2.1373

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.