Teachers Are Not Oppressors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v2i3.886Keywords:
teacher, oppressors, studentsAbstract
Teachers must create a safe, comfortable and positive environment during learning so that students experience a pleasant process so that they focus on learning. Students should not be stressed when taking lessons because it will make students not want to be creative. Teachers are often seen as authoritarian figures who can intimidate students, as oppressors who only want to impose their will without considering students' needs. The method used in this research is a qualitative method through literature study sourced from various journal articles, books and other references to facilitate understanding of the objects discussed. The focus of this research is whether teachers are bullies or teachers who are not bullies. Teachers have good character or good personality competence, respect other people, have a passion for teaching, nurturing, encouraging and motivating, and create a safe and positive learning environment to produce students who are useful to many people. Teachers are not oppressors. Teachers are not people who force or pressure students, but rather educators who are wise, encouraging, and a source of comfort and support for students' positive development. Interactions between teachers and students should be based on respect, understanding and good communication. So the profession shown by a teacher is that teachers are not oppressors.
References
A religion teacher in North Tapanuli harassed 2 female students. (n.d.). Tribunnews. Retrieved from https://www.tribunnews.com/tag/guru-agama-di-tapanuli-utara-lecehkan-2-siswi
Damin, S. (2002). Educational innovation in an effort to increase the professionalism of education personnel (Cet. I). Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Dewi, S. (2019). Become a professional teacher. Riau: PT. Indragiri Dot Com.
Freire, P. (2007). Education of the oppressed. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Hamalik, O. (2001). Teaching and learning process. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Hamalik, O. (2004). Teaching and learning process. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Husen, T., & Postlethwaite, T. (Eds.). (1995). International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon.
Ikmal, H. (2021). Humanist reasoning in education: Learning from Ki Hajar Dewantara and Paulo Freire. East Java: Nawa Litera Publishing.
Mariyana, R., et al. (2009). Learning environment management. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Morris, T. H. (2022). How creativity is oppressed through traditional education. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 30(3), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/oth-09-2022-124
Muller, M., & Boutte, G. S. (2019). A framework for helping teachers interrupt oppression in their classrooms. Journal for Multicultural Education, 13(1), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-09-2017-0052
Mulyasa, E. (2002). Competency-based curriculum: Concept, characteristics and implementation. Bandung: PT Teen Rosdakarya.
Poerwadaminta, W. J. S. (1985). General Indonesian dictionary (Cet. VIII). Jakarta: PN Balai Pustaka.
Regarding the bullying case, the Tarutung 3 High School teacher reported it to the police. (2022). iNews. Retrieved from https://medan.inews.id/read/424879/soal-kas-bullying-guru-sma-3-tarutung-dilaporkan-ke-polisi?utm_medium=sosmed&utm_source
Samba, S. (2007). It's better not to go to school. Yogyakarta: LkiS.
Sudirman, A. M. (2000). Interaction and motivation for teaching and learning (Cet. VII). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suwatra, I. I. W. (2014). Sociology of education. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2000). New paradigm of national education. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Wiyono, B. B. (2003). Relationship between learning environments. Jakarta: Research Forum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts, Culture, and Social Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.