Konflik Politik dan Lingkungan
Studi Tentang Pembangunan PLTU Ropa Kecamatan Maurole Kabupaten Ende
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59024/atmosfer.v4i3.1957Keywords:
Community Participation, Conflict Theory, Environmental Conflict, Political Conflict, Ropa Coal-Fired Power Plant (Pltu Ropa)Abstract
This study aims to analyze the dynamics of political and environmental conflicts in the development of the Ropa Coal-Fired Power Plant (PLTU Ropa) in Maurole District, Ende Regency, and to identify the factors influencing conflicts among the local community, the government, and the company. Although the construction of PLTU Ropa was intended to support electricity supply and regional development, its implementation has generated various social, political, and environmental issues that have led to prolonged conflicts within the community. This research employed a qualitative approach using a descriptive research design. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and were analyzed using Ralf Dahrendorf's Conflict Theory, which emphasizes unequal distribution of power and authority as the primary source of social conflict. The findings indicate that the conflict originated from two major issues, namely land acquisition and environmental impacts resulting from the plant's operation. Political conflict emerged due to the community's dissatisfaction with the land acquisition process, which was perceived as lacking transparency, public participation, and fairness in compensation. Environmental conflict was driven by air pollution caused by coal dust and fly ash, which affected environmental quality, agricultural productivity, fisheries, and public health. The factors influencing the conflict include unequal power relations, weak communication and transparency, limited community participation in decision-making, and differing interests between economic development and environmental protection. The study concludes that resolving the conflict requires strengthening dialogue among stakeholders, improving transparency, and enhancing public participation to achieve a more equitable, inclusive, and sustainable development process.
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Conceicao, J. D. D., Sunadji, & Oedjoe, M. D. R. (2023). Persepsi masyarakat tentang perubahan sosial ekonomi penyebaran limbah PLTU Bolok terhadap kegiatan budidaya rumput laut di perairan Kecamatan Kupang Barat. Jurnal Aquatik, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.35508/aquatik.v6i2.12838
Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Free Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press.
Fisher, S., Abdi, D. I., Ludin, J., Smith, R., Williams, S., & Williams, S. (2001). Working with conflict: Skills and strategies for action. Zed Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Beacon Press.
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). JDIH BPK: Database peraturan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology. Progress Publishers.
Martínez-Alier, J. (2002). The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843765486
Maufa, Y. A., Oedjoe, M. D. R., & Liufeto, F. C. (2023). Respon pertumbuhan rumput laut (Kappaphycus alvarezii) terhadap limbah panas PLTU di perairan Bolok, Kabupaten Kupang.
Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford University Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Peluso, N. L., & Watts, M. (Eds.). (2001). Violent environments. Cornell University Press.
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-3). Alfabeta.
Sumartono. (2019). Dinamika peraturan sosial dalam teori. https://doi.org/10.36914/k10ng203
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agustinus Salman Sidi, Ananias R. P. Jacob, Ambrosius Dedi A. Sinu, Rex Tiran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








