Pengembangan Instrumen Diagnostik Five-Tier Multirepresentasi untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Topik Gelombang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59024/bhinneka.v4i2.1818Keywords:
Diagnostic Instrument; Five-Tier; Multirepresentation; Misconceptions; WavesAbstract
Misconceptions on the topic of waves are a systemic problem in high school physics learning that requires a comprehensive diagnostic instrument. Conventional diagnostic instruments up to the four-tier generation have limitations in revealing the conceptual structure behind students' thinking errors. This study aims to develop a five-tier multi-representation diagnostic instrument on the topic of waves using the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The main innovation of this instrument lies in the integration of multi-representations (verbal, pictures, graphics, mathematical) in Tier 1 and the addition of a paraphrase tier (Tier 5) that asks students to rewrite their understanding in their own words. The development process includes needs analysis, designing a grid of 16 questions, validation by two experts, and a limited trial on 34 grade XI students of SMAN 13 Kota Jambi. The results of expert validation showed an average percentage of 91.25% (Very Good) from both validators. Content validity was met with a percentage of False Positive (FP) of 6.80% and False Negative (FN) of 4.41%, both below the 10% threshold. Construct validity was confirmed through a significant Product Moment correlation (r = 0.342–0.348; sig. < 0.05) and factor analysis with six significant factors (eigenvalue > 1). The instrument's reliability was high, with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.726. This instrument is expected to help physics teachers diagnose students' misconceptions more precisely and thoroughly on the topic of waves.
References
Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 191–208). Springer.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek.
Amalia, R., Rahmawati, Y., & Liliasari. (2025). Developing A Five-Tier Instrument With Multirepresentation For Diagnosing Misconceptions On Momentum And Impulse. Journal of Physics Education, 13(1), 1–15.
Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130
Çelikkanlı & Kızılcık (2022), “A Review of Studies About Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests in Physics Education” Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1291–1311, DOI: 10.36681/tused.2022.175.
Fitriani, R., Maison, Asrial, Purwaningsih, S., & Asma, R. (2023). Diagnosing Students ’ Conception of Wave Propagation Using the Five-Tier Isomorphic Instrument. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9461–9473. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5413
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
Haliza, N., & Hadi, S. (2022). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada materi getaran, gelombang, dan bunyi. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 456–467.
Kaharuddin, K. (2020). Analisis Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Karyawan Pada Yayasan Sahabat Bunda Kota Makassar. FORECASTING: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen, 2(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/https://e-journal.unimaju.ac.id/index.php/FJIIM/article/view/277
Nikat, R. F., Loupatty, M., Zahroh, S. H., Fisika, P., & Literatur, K. (2021). Kajian Pendekatan Multirepresentasi dalam Konteks Pembelajaran Fisika. 45–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52434/jpif.v1i2.1449
Okpatrioka. (2023). Research and development (R&D): Penelitian yang inovatif dalam pendidikan. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 1498–1510. 10.47861/jdan.v1i1.154
Purwoko, R. Y., Nugroho, A. A., & Dwijayanti, I. (2020). Analisis interaktif Miles dan Huberman dalam penelitian pengembangan pendidikan matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 1–12.
Resbiantoro, G., Aldila, A., & Diantoro, M. (2022). A systematic review of misconceptions in physics education from 2010–2020. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2355, 012051. 10.36681/tused.2022.128.
Riduwan. (2015). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Alfabeta.
Sari, I. P., & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Analisis validitas isi instrumen diagnostik menggunakan persentase FP dan FN pada tes diagnostik konsepsi. JPPS: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 11(1), 23–31.
Setyaningsih, S. (2020). Penguatan Sumber Daya Manajemen Pendidikan Melalui Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis) & Metode SITOREM. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Verdian, E. (2019). Analisis Faktor yang Merupakan Intensi Perpindahan Merek Transportasi Online di Surabaya. Agora, 7(1), 287280.
Widodo, P. B. (2006). Reliabilitas dan validitas konstruk skala konsep diri untuk mahasiswa Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Diponegoro, 3(1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tiara Sandari M, Maison Maison, Ilham Falani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






