Tindak Tutur Representatif pada Video Konsep Dasar Memahami Manusia dalam Platform YouTube Cania Citta

Authors

  • Aprillia Puspita Sari Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Khairunnisa Ardhana Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Fadla Cahya Salsabila Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Intan Puspita Listyani Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Sisya Nirmala Meida Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Tiara Dihas Sapuri Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/bhinneka.v4i2.1621

Keywords:

Komunikasi Edukatif, Pragmatik, Tindak Tutur Representatif, Wacana Digital, YouTube

Abstract

This research aims to describe the forms and functions of representative speech acts found in the YouTube video “The Basic Concept of Understanding Humans” by Cania Citta. The study arises from the phenomenon of digital communication, which demonstrates a shift in speech patterns from merely delivering information to constructing intellectual discourse that is both reflective and argumentative. A descriptive qualitative method with a pragmatic approach was employed. The data, consisting of representative utterances, were collected through observation and note-taking techniques on video transcripts, then analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, which involves data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that the dominant representative speech acts include stating, explaining, reporting, concluding, and speculating. Each utterance functions not only to convey information but also to build rational argumentation and foster critical awareness among audiences regarding the concept of humanity. Illocutionarily, these utterances perform informative, argumentative, and reflective functions, emphasizing the speaker’s epistemic responsibility toward the truth of the propositions delivered. The perlocutionary effects include an increased interest and heightened critical awareness among audiences concerning philosophical issues about human nature. This study contributes to the development of pragmatic studies, particularly in understanding the role of language as an instrument of knowledge and persuasion in digital media.

References

Ajeng Ayuningdyas, A., Pujiatmoko, L., Ningrum, M. W., Saputra, M. F. R. Z., Widiyanto, T., Utomo, A. P. Y., Kurnianto, H., & Riyanto, E. A. (2025). Analisis tindak tutur representatif dalam unggahan video edukasi sains pada saluran media sosial YouTube Fajrul Fx. Student Research Journal, 3(1), 301–333. https://doi.org/10.55606/srj-yappi.v3i1.1775

Al Farizi, M. A., Azizah, H. R. N., Putri, S. A., Linawati, A., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2023). Analisis tindak tutur representatif pada daftar putar “MKU Bahasa Indonesia” dalam channel Rahmat Petuguran. Pena Literasi, 6(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.24853/pl.6.1.40-53

Alston, W. P., & Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. The Philosophical Quarterly, 20(79), 172. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218090

Anelda, U. B., Jannati, P., Malahati, F., & Qathrunnada. (2023). Kualitatif: Memahami karakteristik penelitian sebagai metodologi. 11(2), 341–348.

Anis Ulfah, A., Jumrah, N., Paraswati, Y. D., Kusumawati, A., Utomo, A. P. Y., Mijianti, Y., & Kesuma, R. G. (2024). Analysis of representative speech acts on the education portal channel “Summary of Indonesian Language Material Class 7 K-13.” International Journal of Educational Development, 1(2), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijed.v1i2.34

Anjora, A. K., Anggraeni, E., Kurnianingtyas, H., Aisyah, M. N., Salsabella, N. D., Utomo, A. P. Y., Nugroho, A. E., & Hudhana, W. D. (2025). Analisis tindak tutur representatif dan impositif dr. Tirta pada video kesehatan #suaratirta dalam kanal YouTube Tirta PengPengPeng. Journal of Student Research, 3(2), 17–42.

Ardelia April Soneli, A., Salsabila, N., Amarsa, T., Angraini, O. D., Wismanto, & Mayasari, F. (2024). Islam sebagai rahmatan lil alamin. Journal of Student Research, 3(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v3i1.3475

Ariyadi, A. D., HP, M. K., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2021). Analisis tindak tutur ilokusi film pendek “Nanti kita cerita tentang hari ini the series eps 01” pada kanal YouTube Toyota Indonesia. Sarasvati, 3(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.30742/sv.v3i2.1679

Arni Yuniar Prastika, A., Nadhifah, M., Dini, R., & Ahmad, N. (2025). Ekspresi sastra dan visual: Analisis konten kanal YouTube Rekam Nusantara sebagai media kampanye lingkungan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa, 4(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurribah.v4i1.4389

Arsya Ramadhani, A., Sustiani, D., Hardiansah, I. P., Maharani, K. F., Farradina, N. D., Utomo, A. P. Y., Pramono, D., & Setiawan, K. E. P. (2025). Analisis tindak tutur representatif dalam daftar putar “Alam semesta dan luar angkasa” pada kanal YouTube Kok Bisa? Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Umum, 3(1), 203–242. https://doi.org/10.47861/jkpu-nalanda.v3i1.1541

Damayanti, V. A., Permatasari, I. O., Zelig, K. B. Y., Pramana, H. R., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2022). Analisis tindak tutur lokusi pada video pembelajaran di daftar putar “Bahasa” dari channel Pahamify. Jurnal Sinestesia, 12(2).

Devianty, R. (2017). Bahasa sebagai cerminan budaya bangsa. Jurnal Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan, 8(1), 33–45.

Dian Safitri, R., & Mulyani, M. (2021). Teori tindak tutur dalam studi pragmatik. Jurnal Kabastra, 1(1), 59–67.

Fadilla Ahammi, F., Ibrani, M. A., Cahyaningrum, R. A. Y., Bintang, A., Juniar, A. D., Utomo, A. P. Y., Neina, Q. A., & Maharani, A. T. (2025). Analisis tindak tutur representatif dalam video bertema “Sumber energi kelas 10 kurikulum merdeka” pada channel YouTube Pura-pura Tau Fisika. Nian Tana Sikka, 3(1), 205–243. https://doi.org/10.59603/niantanasikka.v3i1.719

Fairclough, N. (1996). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(5), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)89194-6

Finda Rosita Dewi, F., Nabila, A. A., Az-zahroh, F. S., Murdiyanti, A., Utomo, A. P. Y., Anam, Z., & Kesuma, R. G. (2024). Analisis tindak tutur lokusi pada unggahan video self improvement dalam akun Instagram Hawaariyyun. Pragmatik, 2(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.61132/pragmatik.v2i2.393

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar.

Haryanti, E. (2019). Penggunaan bahasa dalam perspektif tindak tutur. Jurnal Tambora, 3(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.36761/jt.v3i1.179

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Samal, A. L., & Ardianto. (n.d.). Bahasa Indonesia dan karya tulis ilmiah untuk perguruan tinggi.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.

Utami, R., & Rizal, M. (2022). Bahasa dalam konteks sosial. JUMPER: Journal of Educational Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.56921/jumper.v1i1.36

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-03

How to Cite

Aprillia Puspita Sari, Khairunnisa Ardhana, Fadla Cahya Salsabila, Intan Puspita Listyani, Sisya Nirmala Meida, Tiara Dihas Sapuri, & Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo. (2026). Tindak Tutur Representatif pada Video Konsep Dasar Memahami Manusia dalam Platform YouTube Cania Citta. Bhinneka: Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Dan Bahasa, 4(2), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.59024/bhinneka.v4i2.1621

Issue

Section

Articles